It also stated that no embryo used in research could be transferred to a woman, and an embryo is only allowed to be developed for 14 days after fertilisation.
Evil science geniuses need not apply! This is when cloning moved into the fast lane. Megan and Morag were born - two lambs cloned without the use of embryonic cells. British science duo Ian Wilmut and Keith Campbell switched the nuclei of cultured cells with the nuclei of egg cells. This new method gave rise to the new method of using somatic cells non-embryonic cells. In this case, they used the nuclei of udder cells to create embryos. Experiments abounded across the world and a wide variety of animals - including mice, goats and cows - were cloned.
They even managed to clone a male mouse - all other clone animals had been female up to this point. This seemed to bring the idea of cloning humans even closer. Scientists understood that cloning could offer the world something different - give endangered species a fighting chance to beat extinction.
Goats were used as egg donors and surrogates for the genes of the extinct bucardo, a type of Spanish mountain goat. The first goat kid died due to a lung defect, but for a brief moment, the species was brought back to life. To this day, Professor Hwang Woo-Suk and his team in Siberia are attempting to resurrect the woolly mammoth after several thousand years of extinction!
The first successful human embryos created using somatic cell nuclear transfer were announced in by Andrew French an Australian scientist and Samuel Wood an American fertility specialist. Five years later, the first human embryonic stem cells were created. Shoukhrat Mitalipov and his team in x used somatic cell nuclear transfer of a patient's skin cells to a donated egg cell. This created an embryo that was used as a source of embryonic stem cells. Because this is a non-binding ban, we can still continue our research - but cloning is currently only allowed for therapeutic reasons, such as stem-cell research and organ printing.
Reproductive cloning of humans is still off the table. Therapeutic cloning involves combining the body of an egg cell with the nucleus of an ordinary cell from elsewhere in that organism, to make a stem cell. Scientists hope that they'll be able to use these stem cells to help cure serious diseases, such as spinal cord injuries and heart disease, as the cells would be able to grow and replace damaged parts of our bodies.
We can manipulate the plasmas of life with unprecedented power, and it confers on us a responsibility. Is it okay to manipulate and create whatever creatures we want? Is it fair for us to design animals exactly how we would like them? It also might mean we could eliminate pregnancy and childbirth altogether which some women may be happy about and bring all children into existence through cloning. In , the UN adopted the declaration on human cloning, which prohibited any forms of human cloning, as it was considered to go against the idea of human dignity and the protection of human life.
We use cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. By continuing without changing your cookie settings, we assume you agree to this. Please read our cookie policy to find out more.
Can cloning save lives? Therapeutic Cloning Therapeutic cloning also called Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer - SCNT is the combining of the body of an egg cell with the nucleus of an ordinary cell from elsewhere in that organism.
What are stem cells? A colony of embryonic stem cells Stem cells are the basic building blocks of plants and animals.
How might they be used? There aren't any other working stem cell treatments at the moment, but there's a huge amount of work going on to make treatments based on therapeutic cloning and stem cells: Degenerative brain diseases: it might eventually be possible to cure or reduce conditions like ALS, Parkinson's or Alzheimer's by using stem cells to replace damaged brain tissue.
Heart disease: your heart is a very special muscle - it works all your life but it never stops, sleeps or gets tired. This larger study found that one in every 25 genes was abnormal in placentas from cloned mice. The livers of the cloned mice also showed less serious genetic problems.
Mice are often used as a model for developing human drugs and medical procedures. The results could be the nail in the coffin for would-be human cloners. One human reproductive cloning advocate accused Jaenisch of cloaking moral arguments in complicated science that's impossible for non-scientists to decipher. This is a scientist who has climbed into the pulpit and has his sermons published on the National Academy of Sciences website," said Randolfe Wicker, founder of the Clone Rights United Front and the Human Cloning Foundation.
A press release from the Whitehead Institute said that the study proves that no matter how normal a cloned animal may look at birth, it will likely develop health problems later in life. Judy Norsigian, executive director and co-founder of the Boston Women's Health Book Collective , said the results underscore what she and other women's health advocates have been saying for the past two years -- that human cloning should be banned globally.
It would violate deeply and widely held convictions concerning human individuality and freedom, and could lead to a devaluation of clones in comparison with non-clones. Cloned children would unavoidably be raised "in the shadow" of their nuclear donor, in a way that would strongly tend to constrain individual psychological and social development. Reproductive cloning is inherently unsafe.
The technique could not be developed in humans without putting the physical safety of the clones and the women who bear them at grave risk. If reproductive cloning is permitted to happen and becomes accepted, it is difficult to see how any other dangerous applications of genetic engineering technology could be proscribed.
This will be true only if we allow it to be true. There is no reason that individuals and society can't learn to embrace human clones as just one more element of human diversity and creativity.
The problem of "expectations" is hardly unique to cloned children. Most parents learn to communicate their expectations about their children in a moderate and ultimately positive way. Every medical technology carries with it a degree of risk. Cloning techniques will eventually be perfected in mammals and will then be suitable for human trials. Reproductive cloning can provide genetically related children for people who cannot be helped by other fertility treatments i.
Reproductive cloning would allow lesbians to have a child without having to use donor sperm, and gay men to have a child that does not have genes derived from an egg donor though, of course, a surrogate would have to carry the pregnancy. Reproductive cloning could allow parents of a child who has died to seek redress for their loss. Cloning is a reproductive right, and should be allowed once it is judged to be no less safe than natural reproduction.
The number of men and women who do not produce eggs or sperm at all is very small, and has been greatly reduced by modern assisted-reproduction techniques. If cloning could be perfected and used for this limited group, it would be all but impossible to prevent its use from spreading. Further, this argument appropriates the phrase "genetically related" to embrace a condition that has never before occurred in human history, one which abolishes the genetic variations that have always existed between parent and child.
Even if cloning were safe, it would be impossible to allow reproductive cloning for lesbians or gay men without making it generally available to all. Policy and social changes that protect lesbian and gay families are a much more pressing need.
0コメント